Collaborative Impact
Home Blogs
Who we are What we do Our Team
Approach & Models Overview PIALA Design Forum & Foresight Double Diamond (4D)
Methods overview Theory of System Change (ToSC) Participatory Sensemaking Participatory Market Mapping Organy Outcome Harvesting Participatory Statistics Constituent Voice SenseMaker® Sustainable Return on Investment Contribution Tracing Configurational Analysis Conventional Statistics and Quasi Experiments
Projects Overview Evaluation Projects Strategy & Learning Projects Innovation Capacity Projects Partnership Projects Project Locations
Books & Articles Reports & Guides
Work with us Partner Organisations Visual Artists & Story Tellers Clients
Home About us Who we are What we do Our Team Approach & Models Approach & Models Overview PIALA Design Forum & Foresight Double Diamond (4D) Methods Methods overview Theory of System Change (ToSC) Participatory Sensemaking Participatory Market Mapping Organy Outcome Harvesting Participatory Statistics Constituent Voice SenseMaker® Sustainable Return on Investment Contribution Tracing Configurational Analysis Conventional Statistics and Quasi Experiments Projects Projects Overview Evaluation Projects Strategy & Learning Projects Innovation Capacity Projects Partnership Projects Project Locations Reports & Publications Books & Articles Reports & Guides Blogs Collaborators Work with us Partner Organisations Visual Artists & Story Tellers Clients
Collaborative Impact
Holland J et al (2018). Getting the Most Out of Participatory Impact Assessment: Reflections from a Multi-Country Cash Transfer Impact Assessment. CDI Practice Paper 19. IDS.
Holland J et al (2018). Getting the Most Out of Participatory Impact Assessment: Reflections from a Multi-Country Cash Transfer Impact Assessment. CDI Practice Paper 19. IDS.

Holland J et al (2018). Getting the Most Out of Participatory Impact Assessment: Reflections from a Multi-Country Cash Transfer Impact Assessment. CDI Practice Paper 19. IDS.

Heinemann E, Van Hemelrijck A and Gujit I. (2017). Getting the most out of impact evaluation for learning, reporting and influence. IFAD Research Series (16).

Heinemann E, Van Hemelrijck A and Gujit I. (2017). Getting the most out of impact evaluation for learning, reporting and influence. IFAD Research Series (16).

Van Hemelrijck A. (2013). Powerful Beyond Measure? Measuring complex systemic change in collaborative settings. Chapter 2 in: Sustainable Participation and Culture in Communication. Intellect.

Van Hemelrijck A. (2013). Powerful Beyond Measure? Measuring complex systemic change in collaborative settings. Chapter 2 in: Sustainable Participation and Culture in Communication. Intellect.

Van Hemelrijck A and Gujit I. (2016). Balancing Inclusiveness, Rigour and Feasibility: Insights from Participatory Impact Evaluations in Ghana and Vietnam. CDI Practice Paper (14). IDS.

Van Hemelrijck A and Gujit I. (2016). Balancing Inclusiveness, Rigour and Feasibility: Insights from Participatory Impact Evaluations in Ghana and Vietnam. CDI Practice Paper (14). IDS.

Van Hemelrijck A. (2017). Rising to the Challenges of Impact Evaluation. Insights from Piloting a Systemic and Participatory Approach. Chapter 19 in: Van Den Berg. Evaluation for Agenda 2030. IDEAS.

Van Hemelrijck A. (2017). Rising to the Challenges of Impact Evaluation. Insights from Piloting a Systemic and Participatory Approach. Chapter 19 in: Van Den Berg. Evaluation for Agenda 2030. IDEAS.

Holland J and Chambers R. (2013). Who Counts? The power of Participatory Statistics. Practical Action.

Holland J and Chambers R. (2013). Who Counts? The power of Participatory Statistics. Practical Action.

Holland J. et al. (2017). The Livelihood Impacts of Cash Transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Beneficiary Perspectives from Six Countries. World Development. Elsevier.

Holland J. et al. (2017). The Livelihood Impacts of Cash Transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Beneficiary Perspectives from Six Countries. World Development. Elsevier.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Previous Next
Holland J et al (2018). Getting the Most Out of Participatory Impact Assessment: Reflections from a Multi-Country Cash Transfer Impact Assessment. CDI Practice Paper 19. IDS.
Heinemann E, Van Hemelrijck A and Gujit I. (2017). Getting the most out of impact evaluation for learning, reporting and influence. IFAD Research Series (16).
Van Hemelrijck A. (2013). Powerful Beyond Measure? Measuring complex systemic change in collaborative settings. Chapter 2 in: Sustainable Participation and Culture in Communication. Intellect.
Van Hemelrijck A and Gujit I. (2016). Balancing Inclusiveness, Rigour and Feasibility: Insights from Participatory Impact Evaluations in Ghana and Vietnam. CDI Practice Paper (14). IDS.
Van Hemelrijck A. (2017). Rising to the Challenges of Impact Evaluation. Insights from Piloting a Systemic and Participatory Approach. Chapter 19 in: Van Den Berg. Evaluation for Agenda 2030. IDEAS.
Holland J and Chambers R. (2013). Who Counts? The power of Participatory Statistics. Practical Action.
Holland J. et al. (2017). The Livelihood Impacts of Cash Transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Beneficiary Perspectives from Six Countries. World Development. Elsevier.

Belgium - Brazil - India - Italy - Spain - United Kingdom

info@collabimpact.org

Impacts That Matter LP
J. Wielemansstraat 19, Alsemberg 1652, Belgium
BE 0700 533 703.